Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Trump Tramples the Palestinians at AIPAC and Pledges to Destroy All of Our Alliances Against the Communists

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

As I suspected would happen, Trump is filling the mould of the anti-NATO, anti-immigration Putin puppets. But Trump has taken his jewish agenda a step further by declaring that Jerusalem is the eternal capital of the jewish state.

Furthermore, Trump is again pledging to drive Muslims behind an iron curtain by curtailing the free speech of Palestinians and calling for Belgium to block Muslim access to the West. Trump celebrates the birth of his jewish grandchild, especially because it is jewish, not because it is a Trump by blood.

And right on cue, as happened in Paris, Putin's ISIS benefits Trump's election day success with a terrorist attack. Immediately after Trump pledged himself to Israel in messianic and racist terms, Putin's terrorists lent him a boost, especially with the Mormons of Utah and conservative Christians and McCain's Christian zionists of Arizona.

Trump, like the Le Pens, the Pegidas and Putin's other puppet fronts, is calling for America to drop its support for NATO, and withdraw from our allies in and around Asia. This can only benefit the communists who want to obliterate Europe and Western Civilization.

I feared this would happen and so it has. We should be very concerned about Trump's hostility towards our fundamental rights. He, like Putin, may try to rob us of our right of free speech and throw us in the gulag for telling the truth about his beloved jews. Undoing the Iran deal will lead to new sanctions which will benefit only Russia in its quest to drive up oil prices and cut off Europe from Iranian oil and natural gas.

It is increasingly apparent that the career con man Donald Trump is getting elected on the immigration issue so he can hand over America and Europe to the Eurasian communists, and aid Israel in the complete annihilation of Palestine, while trapping Islam in a Russian dominated expanded Soviet Union.

Bad, bad times ahead if Trump continues down this communist jewish path to the fulfillment of jewish messianic prophecy by artificial means.

Note that as Trump declares NATO dead, he concurrently and falsely states that Israel is our strongest ally. The two percent again rob America of our European heritage and ties in favor of making us slaves of the jews. Israel gave our vital military secrets to Red China and Pakistan. Israel has attacked the USS Liberty to draw us into war. Israel caused all of our wars since its existence.

Trump is Israel's best ally, but they are our worst enemy!

Sunday, March 13, 2016

John Kasich Is an Anti-White Propagandist for the Jews

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Republican Party presidential candidate John Kasich is an anti-White propagandist, who masks his hatred of the White Race behind a shroud of Christian Zionism. Like Mike Huckabee, Kasich has shamelessly participated in Fox News' incestuous relationship between mass media and politics, a stark conflict of interests once strongly condemned in Western Civilization. This consolidation of church, State and mass media behind the jewish agenda has done tremendous harm to America and the World. The same centralization of power serving jewish interests over that of the majority population occurred in the Soviet Union and continues in Russia under Vladimir Putin.

Brazen hypocrite Kasich mistreated his guest Matt Hale in the following interview which aired on Fox News many years ago. Hale has since been denied his Constitutional rights to practice law and is currently imprisoned in the jewish gulag.

America was founded as a sanctuary for the White Race. Our founding fathers recognized our fundamental rights to legal counsel of our choosing, not that of a jewish master, our right to freedom of and freedom from religion, and our rights of freedom of speech, association and assembly. Kasich stands opposed to our freedoms and calls for the banishment of American patriots. He is a communist propagandist who wants the White Race dissolved out of existence.

The false notion that America is a "melting pot" came from Rothschild agent and British zionist jew Israel Zangwill. The founders declared that America is a White nation in the United States Congress, "An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization" (March 26, 1790):

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States: Provided also, that no person heretofore proscribed by any States, shall be admitted a citizen as aforesaid, except by an Act of the Legislature of the State in which such person was proscribed.

In stark contrast to the intent of the founding fathers, zionist jew and Rothschild agent Israel Zangwill fabricated the myth of an American "melting pot" in his play The Melting Pot: Drama in Four Acts, Macmillan, New York, (1909/1917). Zangwill had a diametrically opposed view of the jewish nation and its quest for racial purity. Zangwill stated in his book The Problem of the Jewish Race, Judaen Publishing Company, New York, (1914), pp. 20-21:

"Moreover,while as already pointed out the Jewish upper classes are, if anything, inferior to the classes into which they are absorbed, the marked superiority of the Jewish masses to their environment, especially in Russia, would render their absorption a tragic degeneration. But if dissolution would bring degeneracy and emancipation dissolution, the only issue from this dilemma is the creation of a Jewish State or at lease a Jewish land of refuge upon a basis of local autonomy to which in the course of the centuries all that was truly Jewish would drift."

We catch Zangwill's and the jews' drift. They would drive us into extinction while preserving themselves at our expense. The jews would refine their own as silver and gold are tried to bring out the best (Zechariah 13:9), while insisting that Whites alloy themselves with what Zangwill considers slag and sludge, so as to completely disappear.

John Kasich is a racist zionist hypocrite, who, like Zangwill, wants the jews to have a segregated nation so as to preserve their race, while breeding out Whites in White nations. John Kasich wants to exterminate us in the US as he uses us as slaves and soldiers to serve jewish segregation in Israel.

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Marco Rubio and the Republican Bosses, If You Can't Beat Him, Cheat Him?

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Trotskyite Republican Party has sunken to new lows to disenfranchise voters. Marco Rubio has gone beyond the dirty trick of vote splitting with his own campaign in hopes of a brokered convention, to openly calling on voters in Ohio to vote for his opponent John Kasich, so that Kasich has better odds of winning Ohio and thereby reducing Trump's chances of scoring enough delegates to win the nomination contest despite leading the race. Rubio is in the race, not to win, but rather to defeat the Republican front runner Donald Trump, even if takes forking over his votes to Kasich, and Rubio has no shame in openly saying so. Rubio is like the scumbag in a basketball game who deliberately fouls out by trying to severely injure the other team's best player and take him out of the game, because he cannot beat them fairly.

The Republican Party coerced Trump into agreeing to a loyalty pledge, but does nothing to censure Rubio for his anti-American campaign to split the vote and spoil the campaign of the Party's leading candidate. Rubio is a creepy thief who wants to steal what he cannot fairly win, robbing not even to keep for himself, but rather to ingratiate himself to his bosses by disenfranchising the voter. He is a diseased lap dog trying to fetch away another's medal for his master.

Whatever happened to letting the voters decide an election, to letting them choose who best represents them? What is this tag team politics of loser takes all by dragging the process down into the mud where the bottom feeders lie? Why is the Republican Party championing losers rather than its own winner?

Let us hope that Rubio's slimy attempts to gang rape the leader fail. Rabid little Marco really is a dirty scurrying rat, wet with the foam of his own drool.

Monday, March 07, 2016

Kyle Hunt of Renegade Broadcasting Interviewed Christopher Jon Bjerknes on 6 March 2016

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Kyle Hunt of Renegade Broadcasting conducted a superb interview with me last night. It is available on YouTube:

The Renegade Broadcasting webpage for the interview appears here:

http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/the-solar-storm-christopher-jon-bjerknes-jewish-racism-3-6-16/

Thank you Mr. Hunt!

Saturday, March 05, 2016

Martin Luther, Johann Eisenmenger and Johannes Buxtorf on the Jews and Their War Against Mankind

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

There are three classic texts which disclose the jewish war on humanity. These are: Martin Luther's On the Jews and Their Lies, Johann Eisenmenger's Rabbinical Literature: Or, The Traditions of the Jews, Johannes Buxtorf's The Jewish Synagogue:

Martin Luther

Dr. Martin Luther's sämmtliche Werke, Volumes 30-32, Die Juden und ihren Luegen

English translation On the Jews and Their Lies

Johann Andreas Eisenmenger Entdecktes Judenthum, Oder Gründlicher und Wahrhaffter Bericht ...

Second Edition

English translation, Rabbinical literature: or, the traditions of the Jews, contained in their ... By Johann Andreas Eisenmenger

Volume 1

Volume 2

Johannes Buxtorf Synagoga Judaica: Das ist Jüden Schul

Buxtorfi Synagoga Judaica noviter restaurata, d. i. erneuerte Juden-Schul

Friday, March 04, 2016

Two of My Recent Interviews Now Available on YouTube

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Henrik Palmgren of Red Ice Radio interviewed me on 16 February 2016, and the first half of the interview is now on YouTube as "Christopher Jon Bjerknes - Albert Einstein: The Myth, the Plagiarist & the Zionist - Hour 1"

A number of people have written to me to let me know that they are having difficulty hearing my voice in many of the interviews. Someone has made an improved audio of the Charles Giuliani interview of 3 February 2016 with an equalized voice soundtrack and posted it on YouTube (Thank you so much for the time and effort it took to do this! It is very helpful and I greatly appreciate it!):

A correspondent has written to me with the suggestion that I do solo presentations, as well as interviews, and post them on YouTube. I think it is a good idea and will try it soon.

Thanks to all!

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Ishmael in the Land of Esau, Why the Jews Have Sent the Muslims into Europe as an Act of Genocide

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The jews believe that only jews are men. According to the jews, Arabs are "asses". This belief comes straight out of the jewish hate literature known to most as the "Old Testament". Ezekiel 23:20 states:

"Yet she multiplied her whoredoms, in calling to remembrance the days of her youth, wherein she had played the harlot in the land of Egypt. For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses." [Cf. The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Berakoth, Folio 58a.]

Ezekiel 34:31 states:

"And ye my flock, the flock of my pasture, are men, and I am your God, saith the Lord GOD."

To the jews, this passage means that only jews are human beings, and that Gentiles are beasts of the fields. [Cf. The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Baba Mezia, Folios 108b & 114b; Tractate Kerithoth, Folio 6b; and Tractate Yebamoth, Folio 61a]

Muslims believe that they inherited God's covenant (Genesis 15:18) from Abraham through Abraham's firstborn child Ishmael, son of Abraham and Hagar. Jews believe that the jewish god instead passed the covenant on to Isaac (Genesis 17:19-21), who was later born to Abraham and Sarah. Ishmael is the biblical father of the Arabs, and has more generally come to symbolize all Muslims. The racist jews refer to Arabs, and Muslims in general, as "Ishmaelites".

The racist Hebrew Bible stigmatizes "Ishmaelites". Genesis 16:12 states:

"And [Ishmael] will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren."

This text reveals to us why the jews are unleashing savage Ishmaelites in White nations. The jews are artificially fulfilling their prophecies in order to bring about our destruction, and their rise as sole inhabitants of the Earth. The jews are pitting the Muslims against Whites, and placing them in our midst, just as the jews pitted Whites against Muslims and sent us into their nations to destroy them.

Jews believe that jewish law expressed in the Talmud grants them special license to murder "Ishmaelites". In addition to the virulently anti-Gentile passages found throughout the Hebrew Bible and in the Talmud and the Zohar, the Talmudic book of Sukkah, folio 52b, not only dehumanizes Arabs, and in the jews' eyes, the Muslims in general, it makes them the enemies of the jewish god,

"R. Hana b. Abba stated: It was said at the schoolhouse, There are four things of which the Holy One, blessed be He, repents that He had created them, and they are the following: Exile, the Chaldeans, the Ishmaelites and Evil Inclination. 'The Exile', since it is written, Now, therefore, what do I here, saith the Lord, seeing that My people is taken away for naught etc.;9 'the Chaldeans', since it is written, Behold the land of the Chaldeans—this is the people that was not;10 'the Ishmaelites', since it is written, The tents of the robbers11 prosper, and they that provoke God are secure since God brought them with His hand;12 'the Evil Inclination', since it is written, [And I will gather her that is driven away] and her that I have afflicted.13"—I. Epstein, Editor, "Sukkah 52b", The Babylonian Talmud, Volume 12, The Soncino Press, London, (1935), pp. 249-252, at 250.

The Zohar, Volume 3, page 282a, degrades Jesus Christ, as does the Talmud. It also degrades the Prophet Mohammed,

"From the side of idolatry Shabbethaj (Saturn) is called Lilith [Footnote: Lilith is a female demon, comp. Is. XXXIV. 14 and Weber, Altsynagogale palaestinische Theologie, p. 246.], mixed dung, on account of the filth mixed from all kinds of dirt and worms, into which they throw dead dogs and dead asses, the sons of 'Esau and Ishma'el, and there (read [Hebrew deleted]) Jesus and Mohammed, who are dead dogs, are buried among them. She (Lilith) is the grave of idolatry, where they bury the uncircumcised, (who are) dead dogs, abomination and bad smell, soiled and fetid, a bad family. She (Lilith) is the ligament [Footnote: {Hebrew deleted} is a fibre attached to the lungs] which holds fast the 'mixed multitude' (Ex. xii. 38), which is mixed among Israel, and which holds fast bone and flesh, that is, the sons of 'Esau and Ishma'el, dead bone and unclean flesh torn of beasts in the field, of which it is said (Ex. xxii. 31): 'Ye shall cast it to the dogs.'"—G. Dalman, Jesus Christ in the Talmud, Midrash, Zohar, and the Liturgy of the Synagogue, Deighton Bell, Cambridge, (1893), p. 40.

For jews, Muslims are the practitioners and enforcers of the Noahide Laws iterated in the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, which call for the beheading of Christian idolaters. The jews instigated the execution of Jesus Christ and poisoned the Prophet Mohammed. To the jews both murderous acts are also symbolic acts and acts of sympathetic magic signifying and provoking the extermination of Esau (Europeans) and Ishmael (Islam) at the points of one another's swords.

The Symbolic Snake of Judaism

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

If we do not act to preserve the White Race, it will be lost forever. The jewish snake, its head our hidden rulers, its body the jewish diaspora, has wrapped itself around the World and is about to consume us. The communists invited in an invasion of Africans and Asians into Europe by means of the corruption of the heads of State of Europe. Now, the communists are pitting the governments of Europe and the White Peoples of Europe against each other. The KGB is funding and covertly leading the reactionary revolutionaries, and the jewish bankers and press keep the corrupted leaders in place, knowingly creating an inevitable clash that will shatter Europe and allow the jews to invite in the Chinese and Russian communists to exterminate the Whites of Europe in the name of social justice, peace and stability.

The jews have been plotting the ruin of Europe for at least 2,500 years. The jewish books of Psalms, chapter 2 and Jeremiah, chapter 30, verses 7-11 state that the jewish king will exterminate the White Race:

"Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?

2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying,

3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.

4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.

5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.

6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.

7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.

9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel.

10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.

11 Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.

12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

[***]

7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob's trouble, but he shall be saved out of it.

8 For it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord of hosts, that I will break his yoke from off thy neck, and will burst thy bonds, and strangers shall no more serve themselves of him:

9 But they shall serve the Lord their God, and David their king, whom I will raise up unto them.

10 Therefore fear thou not, O my servant Jacob, saith the Lord; neither be dismayed, O Israel: for, lo, I will save thee from afar, and thy seed from the land of their captivity; and Jacob shall return, and shall be in rest, and be quiet, and none shall make him afraid.

11 For I am with thee, saith the Lord, to save thee: though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet I will not make a full end of thee: but I will correct thee in measure, and will not leave thee altogether unpunished."

In his racial zionist manifesto, The Jewish State, Theodor Herzl plainly stated that the jews will destroy Gentile States from above and below by their wealth and through the revolutions jews will spark:

At the same time, the equal rights of Jews before the law cannot be withdrawn where they have once been conceded. Not only because their withdrawal would be opposed to the spirit of our age, but also because it would immediately drive all Jews, rich and poor alike, into the ranks of subversive parties. Nothing effectual can really be done to our injury. In olden days our jewels were seized. How is our movable property to be got hold of now? It consists of printed papers which are locked up somewhere or other in the world, perhaps in the coffers of Christians. It is, of course, possible to get at shares and debentures in railways, banks and industrial undertakings of all descriptions by taxation, and where the progressive income-tax is in force all our movable property can eventually be laid hold of. But all these efforts cannot be directed against Jews alone, and wherever they might nevertheless be made, severe economic crises would be their immediate consequences, which would be by no means confined to the Jews who would be the first affected. The very impossibility of getting at the Jews nourishes and embitters hatred of them. Anti-Semitism increases day by day and hour by hour among the nations; indeed, it is bound to increase, because the causes of its growth [91]continue to exist and cannot be removed. Its remote cause is our loss of the power of assimilation during the Middle Ages; its immediate cause is our excessive production of mediocre intellects, who cannot find an outlet downwards or upwards—that is to say, no wholesome outlet in either direction. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; and at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.

[***]

Those who really wished to see the Jews disappear through intermixture with other nations, can only hope to see it come about in one way. The Jews must previously acquire economic power sufficiently great to overcome the old social prejudice against them. The aristocracy may serve as an example of this, for in its ranks occur the proportionately largest numbers of mixed marriages. The Jewish families which regild the old nobility with their money become gradually absorbed. But what form would this phenomenon assume in the middle classes, where (the Jews being a bourgeois people) the Jewish question is mainly concentrated? A previous acquisition of power could be synonymous with that economic supremacy which Jews are already erroneously declared to possess. And if the power they now possess creates rage and indignation among the Anti-Semites, what outbreaks would such an increase of power create? Hence the first step towards absorption will never be taken, because this step would involve the subjection of the majority to a hitherto scorned minority, possessing neither military nor administrative power of its own. I think, therefore, that the absorption of Jews by means of their prosperity is unlikely to occur. In countries which now are Anti-Semitic my view will be approved. In others, where Jews now feel comfortable, it will probably be violently disputed by them. My happier co-religionists will not believe me till Jew-baiting teaches them the truth; for the longer Anti-Semitism lies in abeyance the more fiercely will it break out. The infiltration of immigrating Jews, attracted to a land by apparent security, and the ascent in the social scale of native Jews, combine powerfully to bring about a revolution. Nothing is plainer than this rational conclusion."

Levi Chazen wrote,

"Our rabbis have already told us that the ways of the Redemption and Mashiach are likened to a snake, hidden from all."Levi Chazen, "Vayeshev: The Lessons of the Two Mashiachs", IsraelNationalNews.com, http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/7585, (29 November 2007).

Paquita de Shishmareff wrote in her book Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ, quoting Sergei Nilus, who published The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in 1905, tens years before The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians and 12 years before the Jewish takeover of the Russian Empire,

"II—The Symbolic Snake of Judaism

Protocol III opens with a reference to the Symbolic Snake of Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the [Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion] Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:—

According to the records of secret Jewish Zionism, Solomon and other Jewish learned men had already, in 929 B.C., thought out a theoretical scheme for the peaceful conquest of the whole universe by Zion.

As the course of history unfolded, this scheme was elaborated in detail and completed by later generations of men who had been initiated into their secrets. These learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer the world for Zion with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose head was to represent those who have been initiated into the plans of the Jewish administration, and the body of the Snake to represent the Jewish people—the administration was always kept secret, even from the Jewish nation itself. As this Snake penetrated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered it undermined and devoured all the non-Jewish power of these States. It is foretold that the Snake has still to finish its work, strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it has to run is closed by the return of its head to Zion and until, by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and has encircled it—and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by using every endeavour to subdue the other countries by economic conquest.

The return of the head of the snake to Zion can only be accomplished after the power of all the Sovereigns of Europe has been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have been brought about spiritual demoralisation and moral corruption, chiefly with the assistance of Jewish women masquerading as French, Italians, etc. Their example is the surest method of encouraging licentiousness among the leaders of the nations.

A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as follows:—Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece, where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C. The third in Madrid in the time of Charles V, in A.D. 1552. The fourth in Paris about 1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from 1841 onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in St. Petersburg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date of 1881.

All these states which the Snake traversed have had the foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic conditions England and Germany are spared, but only till the conquest of Russia is accomplished by the Snake, on which at present (i.e., 1905) all its efforts are concentrated. The further course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kieff and Odessa.

It is now well known to us to what extent the latter cities form the centres of the militant Jewish race. Constantinople is shown as the last stage of the Snake’s course before it reaches Jerusalem. (This map was drawn years before the occurrence of the ‘Young Turk’—i.e., Jewish—Revolution in Turkey)."—L. Fry, Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ, TBR Books, Washington, D. C., (2000), pp. 112-113.

Protocol 3 states:

"PROTOCOL NO. III

TO-DAY I can tell you that our goal is close at hand. Only a small distance remains, and the cycle of the Symbolic Serpent—the symbol of our people—will be complete. When this circle is completed, then all the European states will be enclosed in it as in strong claws.

The modern constitutional scales will soon tip over, for we have set them inaccurately, thus insuring an unsteady balance for the purpose of wearing out their holder. The Goys thought it had been sufficiently strongly made and hoped that the scales would regain their equilibrium, but the holder—the ruler—is screened from the people by his representatives, who fritter away their time, carried away by their uncontrolled and irresponsible authority. Their power, moreover, has been built up on terrorism spread through the palaces. Unable to reach the hearts of their people, the rulers cannot unite with them to gain strength against the usurpers of power. The visible power of royalty and the blind power of the masses, separated by us, have both lost significance, for separated, they are as helpless as the blind man without a stick.

To induce the lovers of authority to abuse their power, we have placed all the forces in opposition to each other, having developed their liberal tendencies towards independence. We have excited different forms of initiative in that direction; we have armed all the parties; we have made authority the target of all ambitions. We have opened the arenas in different states, where revolts are now occurring, and disorders and bankruptcy will shortly appear everywhere.

Unrestrained babblers have converted parliamentary sessions and administrative meetings into oratorical contests. Daring journalists, impudent pamphleteers, make daily attacks on the administrative personnel. The abuse of power is definitely preparing the downfall of all institutions and everything will be overturned by the blows of the infuriated mobs.

The people are shackled by poverty to heavy labor more surely than they were by slavery and serfdom. They could liberate themselves from those in one way or another, whereas they cannot free themselves from misery. We have included in constitutions rights which for the people are fictitious and are not actual rights. All the so-called 'rights of the people' can exist only in the abstract and can never be realized in practice. What difference does it make to the toiling proletarian, bent double by heavy toil, oppressed by his fate, that the babblers receive the right to talk, journalists the right to mix nonsense with reason in their writings, if the proletariat has no other gain from the constitution than the miserable crumbs which we throw from our table in return for his vote to elect our agents. Republican rights are bitter irony to the poor man, for the necessity of almost daily labor prevents him from using them, and at the same time deprives him of his guarantee of a permanent and certain livelihood by making him dependent upon strikes, organized either by his masters or by his comrades.

Under our guidance the people have exterminated aristocracy, which was their natural protector and guardian, for its own interests are inseparably connected with the well-being of the people. Now, however, with the destruction of this aristocracy the masses have fallen under the power of the profiteers and cunning upstarts, who have settled on the workers as a merciless burden.

We will present ourselves in the guise of saviors of the workers from this oppression when we suggest that they enter our army of Socialists, Anarchists, Communists, to whom we always extend our help, under the guise of the rule of brotherhood demanded by the human solidarity of our social masonry. The aristocracy which benefitted by the labor of the people by right was interested that the workers should be well fed, healthy, and strong.

We, on the contrary, are concerned in the opposite—in the degeneration of the Goys. Our power lies in the chronic malnutrition and in the weakness of the worker, because through this he falls under our power and is unable to find either strength or energy to combat it.

Hunger gives to capital greater power over the worker than the legal authority of the sovereign ever gave to the aristocracy. Through misery and the resulting jealous hatred we manipulate the mob and crush those who stand in our way.

When the time comes for our universal ruler to be crowned, the same hands will sweep away everything which may be an obstacle in our way.

The Goys are no longer accustomed to think without our scientific advice. Consequently, they do not see the imperative need of upholding that which we will sustain by all means when our kingdom is established, namely, the teaching in the schools of the only true science, the first of all sciences—the science of the construction of human life, of social existence, which requires the division of labor and, consequently, the separation of people into classes and castes. It is necessary that all should know that equality cannot exist, owing to the different nature of various kinds of work; that there cannot be the same responsibility before the law in the case of an individual who by his actions compromises an entire caste and another who does not affect anything but his own honor.

The correct science of the social structure, to the secrets of which we do not admit the Goys, would demonstrate to all that occupation and labor must be differentiated so as not to cause human suffering by the discrepancy between education and work. The study of this science will lead the masses to a voluntary submission to the authorities and to the governmental system organized by them. Whereas, under the present state of science, and due to the direction of our guidance therein, the people, in their ignorance, blindly believing the printed word, and owing to the misconceptions which have been fostered by us, feel a hatred towards all classes whom they consider superior to themselves, since they do not understand the importance of each caste.

This hatred will be still more accentuated by the economic crisis, which will stop financial transactions and all industrial life. Having organized a general economic crisis by all possible underhand means, and with the help of gold which is all in our hands, we will throw great crowds of workmen into the street, simultaneously, in all countries of Europe. These crowds will gladly shed the blood of those of whom they, in the simplicity of their ignorance, have been jealous since childhood and whose property they will then be able to loot.

They will not harm our people because we will know of the time of the attack and we will take measures to protect them.

We have persuaded others that progress will lead the Goys into a realm of reason. Our despotism will be of such a nature that it will be in a position to pacify all revolts by wise restrictions and to eliminate liberalism from all institutions.

When the people saw that they obtained concessions and license in the name of liberty, they imagined that they were the masters, and rushed into power; but like every blind person, they encountered innumerable obstacles; they rushed to seek a leader, with no thought of returning to the old one, and laid power at our feet. Remember the French Revolution, which we have called 'great'; the secrets of its preparation are well known to us, for it was the work of our hands.

Since then we have carried the masses from one disappointment to another, so that they will renounce even us in favor of a despot sovereign of Zionist blood, whom we are preparing for the world.

At present, as an international force, we are invulnerable, because if we are attacked by one state we are supported by other states. The unlimited baseness of the Goy peoples, who grovel before force, who are pitiless towards weakness, who are merciless to misdemeanors and lenient to crimes, who are unwilling to tolerate the contradictions of a free social structure; patient unto martyrdom in bearing with the violence of daring despotism—this is what helps our independence. They tolerate and permit such abuses from their modern premiers—dictators—for the least of which they would behead twenty kings.

How can such a phenomenon be explained, such an illogical conception on the part of the mass of the people towards events of seemingly the same nature? This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that these dictators through their agents whisper to their people that by these abuses they injure the states for a supreme purpose, namely, for the attainment of the happiness of the people, their universal fraternity, solidarity, and equality. Of course, they are not told that this unification will be achieved only under our rule. Thus, the people condemn the just and acquit the unjust, more and more convinced that they can do what they please. Owing to this, the people destroy all stability and create disorder on every occasion.

The word 'Liberty' brings all society into conflict with all authority, be it that of God or Nature. This is why, at the moment of our enthronement, we shall strike this word from the dictionary as being the symbol of brute power, which turns the masses into bloodthirsty beasts. It is true, however, that these beasts go to sleep as soon as they have drunk blood, and then it is easy to shackle them; but if the blood is not given to them they will not sleep and will struggle."

Friday, February 26, 2016

Mexican Neocon Vincente Fox Is Attacking Donald Trump

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Like Barack Obama, Vincente Fox headed a very kosher "Mexican" government. Fox's neoconservative policies crossed the line over to treason, so it is no wonder that he is opposed to borders. The many jews in Fox's government sparked outrage and controversy, and they were openly accused of disloyalty to Mexico in favor of jews and zionism. See:

Foreign Secretary of Mexico Jorge Castaneda Gutman Accused of Disloyalty to the Nation

A brief history of the Jews in Mexico BY Mel Goldberg

Like Stalin and Lenin before him, neoconservative trotskyite Vincente Fox made "antisemitism" a crime in Mexico in 2003. Some suspect that Vincente Fox is a crypto-jew. Fidel Castro certainly is.

Fox is now sticking his nose over the border into American politics and is chiding Donald Trump, much like drug runner El Chapo Guzman. Fox wanted America to protect Israel and is all for Israel being a "Jewish State", but America has no right to its national sovereignty, for the whole world is international jewish territory, as proven by Vincente Fox's treasonous government.

Mexico is even dominated by jews in American public life. For example, jewess Patricia Jinich, married to investor Daniel Jinich, hosts a "Mexican" cooking show on American Public Television, and has appeared on Fox News--no relation to old Vincente. See:

http://www.pbs.org/food/chefs/pati-jinich/

PATY JINICH DEMONSTRATION IN FOX NEWS

That jewish privilege appears everywhere, does it not?

Thursday, February 25, 2016

Mitt Romney, Another Loser Close to Goldman Sachs, Attacks Donald Trump

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

On the heels of Super Tuesday, Mitt Romney is attempting to derail Donald Trump's campaign, and to draw him away from Ted Cruz. Romney is claiming that there might be a "bombshell" in Trump's tax returns.

It is doubtful any such bombshell exists beyond Romney's imagination. Trump is running for President. He is not a stupid or naive man. Rather, Trump is being audited, again, and must wait for the process to close before his attorneys will allow him to make his returns public.

So why is Romney attacking Trump at this key juncture in the race? What could motivate him to try to ruin Trump, a fellow Republican and the clear front runner in a race in which Romney is not running?

Romney is another man with close ties to Goldman Sachs, whose (deliberate?) failure in the 2012 Presidential race led to Barack Obama's unlikely victory. See:

Close Ties to Goldman Enrich Romney's Public and Private Lives

Romney's running mate in 2012 against Obama was banker bailout queen Paul Ryan, a libertarian crypto-communist who is now Speaker of the House of Representatives, and who also was big fan of Goldman Sachs. See:

Paul Ryan sold shares on same day as private briefing of banking crisis

Is it just a coincidence that Ted Cruz and his wife are also close to Goldman Sachs? See:

Ted Cruz, Goldman Sachs and the Last [Wo]Man Standing

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Henrik Palmgren of Red Ice Radio Interviewed Christopher Jon Bjerknes on 16 February 2016

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Henrik Palmgren of Red Ice Radio interviewed me on 16 February 2016. It was a fantastic interview! We covered many important topics and spoke for over two hours. A YouTube video is in the works. The first hour of audio is posted here:

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2016/02/RIR-160222.php

The audio of the full interview appears here (membership required):

http://www.redicemembers.com/secure/radio/program.php?id=1082

We discussed my books:

Mileva Einstein-Marity: Einstein's Partner in Crime

ALBERT EINSTEIN The Incorrigible RACIST

Space-Time Theories Before Einstein

The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians

Additional information related to the interview can be found in the following list of links.

I proved the fact that the jews view Gentiles as if subhuman cattle, whom the jews intend to exterminate, in the following blog articles:

In Defense of the Truth and the Right to Speak It: O'Connell Is Innocent: Jews Are Racists. Part 1, January 23, 2010

The Old Testament Is Hate Literature and an Incitement to Genocide

Have You Ever Longed to Be Jewish? Have You Ever Longed to Be a Slave? Have You Ever Longed to Be Dead?

A State Within a State: The Racist Jewish Fifth Column and Fourth Estate in America

I discussed the myth of the Jewish Year 6000 in several articles, and the following links recap most of them:

"The Jewish Year 6000" -- British Israelism / Christian Identity -- 9/11/2001

"The Jewish Year 6000": An Hungarian Rabbi Told Us the 6000 Year Length and Breadth of the World in 1812, and That Israel Would Be Founded in 1948

The cabalistic maxim As Above, So Below, is discussed here:

"As Above, So Below!" The Jews Are Out to Destroy the Guardian Angels of the Goyim, the Animals and the Plants. . . to Destroy All of Creation

This Physics World article, states among other things, "Poincaré had stated that electromagnetic radiation had a momentum and thus effectively a mass, according to E = mc2."–"Did Einstein discover E = mc2?"

I mentioned that Herbert Ives proved that Einstein's derivation of E=mc^2 was circular, and that Ives recognized Poincare's priority for E=mc^2. Here is the citation and full article in pdf: Herbert E. Ives, "Derivation of the Mass-Energy Relation", Journal of the Optical Society of America, Volume 42, (1952), p. 540

The letter which is translated in "Waters Flowing Eastward" states:

In 1492, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, when a Spanish law threatened expulsion.2 This was the reply: " Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as yourselves.

The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:

1. As for what you say that the King of Spain 3 obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise.

2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs.

3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christians' lives.

4. As for what you say of their destroying your syna gogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches.

5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.

6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power.

(Signed) PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE."

The Wikipedia article "One-way speed of light" states:

When using the term 'the speed of light' it is sometimes necessary to make the distinction between its one-way speed and its two-way speed. The "one-way" speed of light from a source to a detector, cannot be measured independently of a convention as to how to synchronize the clocks at the source and the detector. What can however be experimentally measured is the round-trip speed (or "two-way" speed of light) from the source to the detector and back again. Albert Einstein chose a synchronization convention (see Einstein synchronization) that made the one-way speed equal to the two-way speed. The constancy of the one-way speed in any given inertial frame, is the basis of his special theory of relativity although all experimentally verifiable predictions of this theory do not depend on that convention.[1][2]

Experiments that attempted to directly probe the one-way speed of light independent of synchronization have been proposed, but none has succeeded in doing so.[3] Those experiments directly establish that synchronization with slow clock-transport is equivalent to Einstein synchronization, which is an important feature of special relativity. Though those experiments don't directly establish the isotropy of the one-way speed of light, because it was shown that slow clock-transport, the laws of motion, and the way inertial reference frames are defined, already involve the assumption of isotropic one-way speeds and thus are conventional as well.[4] In general, it was shown that these experiments are consistent with anisotropic one-way light speed as long as the two-way light speed is isotropic.[1][5]

Saturday, February 20, 2016

Bradley R. Smith of CODOH Has Passed Away

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

I wish to express my condolences to the family and friends of Bradley R. Smith. I first became acquainted with his work when he appeared on the Phil Donahue show back in 1994. Donahue was quite popular in Chicago and paved the way for Oprah Winfrey. Here is the first part of the show:

I was outraged when David Irving was arrested in 2005 in Austria for thought and speech crimes. The very same day the authorities took him into custody, I sent off an article in defense of Irving to Bradley R. Smith, which he immediately published that same day:

Free Speech, Free David Irving

Rest in peace, Mr. Smith, and thank you for your decades of service!

The Jewish Saint Bernie Sanders: Everyone Takes a Beating, But the Benign Bolshevik Bernie

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

The Washington Post and the Huffington Post publish article after article attacking Donald Trump, and google news and yahoo news link to many of these articles. The press has leveled far worse attacks on Trump than any other candidate. These attacks are more severe both in terms of numbers and degree. The coverage is also disproportionately negative towards Trump than the others, with fewer positive things said about him. The thumbs of the press are definitely trying to tip the scales against Trump in every way they can.

The press is also going after Clinton and Cruz. It is now clear why the Democratic field was so poor from the start. It was the only way the jews could leave communist Bernie Sanders the last man standing after pulling the rug out from under Clinton's campaign.

US Congressman Oscar Callaway revealed in 1917 that the Money Trust was buying up key newspapers in order to hold sway over public opinion and drive us into war against Germany. Callaway's statement is recorded in the Congressional Record for 9 February 1917,

"Mr. CALLAWAY. Mr. Chairman, under unanimous consent, I insert in the Record at this point a statement showing the newspaper combination, which explains their activity in this war matter, just discussed by the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Moore]:

'In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and a sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.

'These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.

'This contract is in existence at the present time, and it accounts for the news columns of the daily press of the country being filled with all sorts of preparedness arguments and misrepresentations as to the present condition of the United States Army and Navy, and the possibility and probability of the United States being attacked by foreign foes.

'This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served. The effectiveness of this scheme has been conclusively demonstrated by the character of stuff carried in the daily press throughout the country since March 1915. They have resorted to anything necessary to commercialize public sentiment and sandbag the National Congress into making extravagant and wasteful appropriations for the Army and Navy under the false pretense that it was necessary. Their stock argument is that it is 'patriotism.' They are playing on every prejudice and passion of the American people.'"--Congressional Record: Containing the Proceedings and Debates of the Second Session of the Sixty-Fourth Congress of the United States, Volume 54, Part 3, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., (27 January 1917-12 February 1917), pp. 2946-2948.

The press deliberately covered up the atrocities of Trotsky, Stalin and the Bolsheviks of the Soviet Empire, aiding and abetting the genocide of tens of millions of the best genetic material of Eastern Europe. The press relentlessly attacked Sen. Joseph McCarthy and brought to an end his purge of communists from the Federal Government of the United States. The press undermined America's war against communism in Vietnam.

Today, the press is attacking every Presidential candidate except the jewish saint and communist Bernie Sanders. Today, the press is savaging Donald Trump.

Trump has promised to fight back against communist China and work towards regime change in communist North Korea. Trump has pledged to bring to an end the communist goal of internationalizing the United States and has promised to restore our national sovereignty.

Friday, February 19, 2016

Trump Ought to Follow Suit with a Lawsuit of His Own

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Lawrence Joyce has filed suit against Ted Cruz alleging that he is ineligible to become President of the United States of America due to the fact that Cruz is not a natural born citizen, but was instead born in Canada. Donald Trump ought to file a similar suit in the appropriate jurisdiction, then submit a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court to hear the case immediately on the grounds that it is an urgent matter of national importance, that only the US Supreme Court has the authority to rule on the issue and is therefore the court of proper jurisdiction, and that a national standard must be set by the highest court because lower courts may issue contradictory opinions, and the matter must be settled with a final standard for all the land.

Let the Supreme Court show its political stripes. Let Cruz squirm under the pressure.

Thursday, February 18, 2016

The KGB POPE: How Dare the Communist-Jesuit Pope Francis Interfere in American Internal Politics During an Election!

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

At a crucial moment in our struggle to survive as Americans in our American nation, the Jesuit bolshevik Pope Francis has interjected himself into our political process by declaring with his papal authority that Donald Trump is not a Christian merely because Trump seeks to defend our laws, our sovereignty and our borders. It was a scandal when J. F. Kennedy ran for President. Given that Kennedy was a Catholic, many Americans feared he would serve under the influence of the Pope.

This bolshevik thug, Pope Francis, has now excommunicated our Republican front runner in the Presidential race from Christendom, and declared it an heresy to be a patriotic American. All the worst fears Americans have had about Catholics, and most especially Jesuits, have now been made flesh and deeds by this communist criminal.

In a previous article, I demonstrated that the Russian Orthodox has been completely taken over by the KGB:

Putin's KGB Crew Exposed, March 17, 2014

I have been warning for a decade about the dangers Christian Zionists, who are firmly under jewish control, pose to America and the World. We can now add the Pope of Rome to the list of our jewish controlled Christian enemies, who relentlessly interfere in our political process, much to our detriment.

This Jesuit bolshevik is also opening up the Roman Catholic Church to the KGB controlled Russian Orthodox Church. Communist Pope Francis met Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill in communist Cuba.

Here is my above referenced article on the KGB communist subversion of the Russian Orthodox Church to render it anti-Western and pro-communist:

KGB Putin's apologists in the West attempt to portray him as if he were antijew and opposed to the Jew World Order, based on the false assumption that Putin's ostentatious gay bashing and sponsorship of the Orthodox Church prove that he is deliberately working against the interests of international jewry. I have already exposed the fact that KGB Putin's gay bashing is in keeping with long standing Soviet policy, as proof that Putin perpetuates the Jew World Order Soviet Union, and that the Soviet Union only appeared to dissolve so as to fool the West into lowering its guard and giving up its secrets and monies to the Soviets:

Putin's Communist Gay Bashing and Its Antifascist Roots, March 07, 2014

In the following article, I exposed the fact that Putin is using the Orthodox Church to foment a Christian Communist church to provide the dialectical alternative to Christian Zionism and provide the basis for the growth of the Soviet Union to include Greece:

The Reds Want to Foment World War III as a Christian Communist Versus Christian Zionist Battle of the Fanatics, March 03, 2014

An article by Scott Greer in The Daily Caller provides a first hand account of the KGB's infiltration of the Orthodox Church and an assessment that Putin is using this KGB influence to expand his empire:

"'About five years ago, Pacepa was warning me about Putin. He's saying Putin is former KGB, Putin has surrounded himself with KGB people everywhere, it is now in essence an ‘intelligence agency dictatorship',' Rychlak, a professor at the University of Mississippi School of Law, told TheDC. [***] In Rychlak's opinion, Russian agencies have subverted the institutions that Eastern Ukrainians rely on for information and has caused some of them to support Putin's interests by demanding Russian annexation.

'All of their news has been filtered through Russian sources and even their church has been infiltrated. Their sources of information for at least a decade and maybe much longer than that, have been controlled,' the law professor explained. 'They have been cultivated and shaped and controlled through Moscow.'

One of the most damning accusations that Rychlak levels at Putin's security apparatus is that it has infiltrated and influenced the Russian Orthodox Church to promote the interests of the Kremlin.

'Dating back to the 1960s, the Kremlin began sending agents into the Russian Orthodox Church, and a lot of those people have filtered up to higher levels. The Russians put people into these churches, knowing they were agents, hoping they would develop into influential positions, and many of them have,' Rychlak continued. 'The church has been tainted, as other churches have been under Soviet domination.' [***] The book 'Disinformation' points out that Soviet intelligence agencies frequently worked with left-wing Westerners, such as the anti-war movement against Vietnam, to further the cause of the USSR. According to Rychlak, the current Russian government still uses the Left for that purpose, as he claims that their ideology isn't too far removed from that of the old Soviet regime.

'You still have folks around the globe, some of whom actively collaborate with the Soviet-Marxist ideology that we still see from Putin. Others who are maybe not intentionally collaborate, what you would call willing dupes, who go along with it,' the 'Disinformation' co-author said."--Scott Greer, "Former Soviet spy chief claims Putin regime is an ‘intelligence agency dictatorship'", The Daily Caller, (7 March 2014).

The above quotation makes note of the fact that numerous dissidents support KGB Putin. I have for many years been informing my readers that Ayn Rand was a Trust controlled opposition agent of the Soviet Union and that libertarians and objectivists are closet communists subverting America and promoting Putin. This book written in 1984 by a KGB insider details how the Soviets previously tried to appear weak so that they could infiltrate the West, cause the West to lower its guard, and deceive the West into believing the Soviet Union had collapsed from within when it had not:

Anatole Golitsyn, The New Lies for Old Ones

Beginning at page 291 and continuing through to page 294, Golitsyn recounts how the KGB subverted and used the Orthodox Church to turn it against the West, though it had always previously been pro-Western, and make it a tool of the communists against the West:

"A special word needs to be said on the exploitation of religion and leading churchmen in the communist world for strategic political purposes.

In November-December 1960 the Patriarch of All Russia, Aleksiy, an old KGB agent, accompanied by Metropolitan Nikodim, head of the Russian Orthodox Church's International Department, and Professor Uspenskiy of the Leningrad Faculty of Theology and an active member of the Soviet Peace Committee, toured the Middle East in an aircraft provided by the Soviet government.12 In the course of the tour Patriarch Aleksiy and the Syrian patriarch issued an official communique that stated: 'Our standpoint of Christian love compels us to condemn everything which incites hatred among peoples and impels mankind toward a new world war and to bless any attempts aimed at creating peace between peoples and nations. . . . We resolutely condemn any manifestation of colonialism as foreign to the spirit and the letter of the law of God.'13 [***] The Great Soviet Encyclopaedia recorded that by 1972 the World Council of Churches had been converted from a 'pro-Western' to a 'progressive' orientation in its policies on peace, disarmament, and related matters. Assiduous advocacy by the Christian Peace Conference and others of the view that Christianity and communism were natural allies in support of the national liberation movement induced the World Council of Churches to provide funds for African guerrilla movements, including the Rhodesian Patriotic Front, believed to be responsible for a massacre of British missionaries in 1978."

Golitsyn reveals the machinations of the "Trust" and the NEP in pages 10- 17. I will quote these passages at length, because they reveal also what Putin and his apologists are doing today, i.e. denying that the Soviet Union exists, infiltrating anticommunist movements, stealing all the West has to offer while subverting the West, only to strengthen the Soviet Union for an unprecedented comeback and rise to World dominating power:

"The pattern of disinformation used during the implementation of a long-range policy may be called the 'weakness and evolution' pattern, or the pattern of 'calculated ideological moderation.' Its aim is to calm the fears of the adversaries of international communism by understating real communist strength and to confound the policies of those adversaries by masking the realities of communist policy. When following this pattern, therefore, disinformation reflects real or imaginary weaknesses, splits, and crises in the communist world and projects an image of evolution away from an ideological toward a conventional, national system. The intention is that the nations of the noncommunist world, accepting the alleged disunity and evolution of the communist world as genuine, will fail to respond effectively to communist offensive strategy and, in their confusion, will be induced to make practical miscalculations and mistakes in their dealings with the communist world. The major role of disinformation in the weakness and evolution pattern is to conceal and misrepresent the real nature, objectives, tactics, and techniques of communist policy. [***] The weakness and evolution pattern was used successfully by Lenin in the 1920s. In 1921 Soviet Russia faced imminent collapse. Industry lay ruined by the war; agriculture was in crisis. The Russian people, disillusioned by the rigid policy of 'war communism,' were on the brink of revolt; the policy of terror was proving ineffective; there were peasant uprisings in Siberia and along the Volga; nationalist movements in the Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, and Central Asia were openly proclaiming separatism and posed a serious threat to national unity; the sailors at the Kronstadt Naval Base revolted. Abroad, the hopes of world revolution had faded after communist defeats in Germany, Poland, and Hungary. The major European powers, although not united, were individually hostile to communism and to the new Soviet state; a huge Russian emigre movement, spread across Europe, was plotting the overthrow of the regime. Soviet Russia was in complete political and economic isolation.

It was in this situation, facing a highly unfavorable balance of power vis-a-vis the West, that Lenin conceived and launched a longrange policy that, over the following eight years, was to show spectacular success. It was given the deliberately misleading title of the New Economic Policy, or NEP. In fact, it ranged far beyond the economy, defining also the principal political and ideological objectives and tactics for the regime internally and externally and the strategy for the international communist movement. Within the terms of the NEP, the Soviet leaders were to eliminate separatism by creating a federation of national republics, the USSR. They were to introduce national long-term economic planning. They were to plan and build an electric power system to cover and bind together the whole country. They were to start to change the world balance of power in communist favor.

To the world at large, the NEP meant that foreign industrialists were offered concessions in Soviet industry and invited to open businesses in Soviet Russia; that Soviet industrial enterprises were to be reorganized as trusts and operated on a profit basis; that smaller enterprises and properties could be owned by cooperatives or private individuals; that money was back in use and private trade permitted; that restrictions on travel were relaxed; that emigres were encouraged to return under amnesty, while some Soviet citizens were allowed to emigrate; and that Soviet diplomacy was seeking peaceful coexistence with the West.

The Soviet leaders saw it differently. They intended that the NEP would not only bring about economic recovery, but would also serve to prevent internal revolt, expand foreign trade, attract foreign capital and expertise, gain diplomatic recognition from non-communist countries, prevent major conflict with the Western powers, help to exploit the contradictions in and between the capitalist countries, neutralize the emigre movement, and help to promote world revolution through the communist movement.

Lenin believed that this fundamentally aggressive and ideological policy could prove effective if it was accompanied by the systematic use of misrepresentation and deception, or, to use the current word, disinformation. The characteristics of this disinformation were an apparent moderation in communist ideology, the avoidance of references to violence in communist methods, the exaggeration of the degree of the restoration of capitalism in Soviet Russia, the use of a sober and businesslike style in diplomatic and commercial negotiations with the West, and emphasis on disarmament and peaceful coexistence. All of this was intended to induce the belief in the outside world that the communist system was weak and losing its revolutionary ardor. Left to itself, it would either disintegrate or come to terms with the capitalist system.

The Soviet security service was reorganized, renamed the OGPU, and given new political tasks. It was directed to mount disinformation and political operations. False opposition movements were set up and controlled secretly by the OGPU. They were designed to attract to their ranks genuine opponents of the regime inside and outside the country. These innocent persons could then be used by the regime in various ways. They could act as channels for disinformation; they could be blackmailed and recruited as agents; they could be arrested and given public trials. A characteristic, but not unique, example of this technique is provided by the so-called 'Trust' operation. In 1921, as the NEP was being launched, the OGPU created inside Soviet Russia a false anti-Soviet organization, the Monarchist Alliance of Central Russia. It had once been a genuine organization, founded by Czarist generals in Moscow and Leningrad but liquidated by the Soviet security service in 1919-20. Former members of this organization, among them Czarist generals and members of the old aristocracy who had come over to the Soviet side, nominally led the movement. Their new loyalty to the Soviet regime was not in doubt, for they had betrayed their former friends in the anticommunist underground. They were the Czarist generals Brusilov and Zaynchkovskiy; the Czarist military attache in Yugoslavia, General Potapov; and the Czarist transport official Yakushev. The most active agent in the Trust was a former intelligence officer of the General Staff in Czarist Russia whose many names included Opperput. Agents of the Trust traveled abroad and established confidential contact with genuine anticommunist emigre leaders in order (ostensibly) to coordinate activity against the Soviet regime. Among the important emigres they met were Boris Savinkov and Generals Wrangel and Kutepov.

These agents confided in their contacts that the anti-Soviet monarchist movement that they represented was now well established in Soviet Russia, had penetrated into the higher levels of the army, the security service, and even the government, and would in time take power and restore the monarchy. They convinced the emigre leaders that the regime had undergone a radical change. Communism had completely failed; ideology was dead; the present leaders had nothing in common with the fanatical revolutionaries of the past. They were nationalists at heart, and their regime was evolving into a moderate, national regime and might soon collapse. The NEP should be seen as the first important concession on the road to restoring capitalism in Russia. Soon political concessions would follow. Because of this, said the Trust agents, any intervention or gesture of hostility from the European powers or the emigre movements would be ill-advised, if not tragic, since it would only unite the Russian people around their government and so extend its survival. The European governments and the emigre leaders should put a stop to anti-Soviet terrorist activities and change their attitude from hostility toward the Soviet regime to one of passive acceptance. They should grant diplomatic recognition and increase trade. In this way they would have a better opportunity to contribute to the evolutionary process. The emigre leaders should return to Russia to make their contribution. Naturally there were doubters among the emigres, but the prestige of the leaders of the organization (particularly, of General Brusilov) convinced the majority. They accepted at face value the Trust's disinformation and passed it on to their influential friends in the European intelligence services. By the time it had been circulated to governments as 'secret' intelligence it sounded most impressive, and when as time went on the same story was confirmed by source after source, it became 'secret and reliable.' The intelligence services of Europe were committed and it was unthinkable that they could all be wrong.

While the Trust was thriving the OGPU took control, wholly or partially, of two other movements calculated to influence the political climate in support of the NEP. They were the 'Change of Signposts' movement and the 'Eurasian' movement. The first was used by the Soviet security service to mislead emigres and intellectuals in Europe into believing that the strength of communist ideology was on the wane and that the Soviet regime was evolving into a more moderate, national state. The movement published, with unofficial government assistance, a weekly magazine in Prague and Paris, The Change of Signposts, and in Berlin a paper, On the Eve. In 1922, at some risk, the Soviet government allowed two magazines to be published in Leningrad and Moscow, New Russia and Russia. They were intended to exert a similar influence on intellectuals inside the country.

By 1926 all publications of the Change of Signposts movement had been wound up, the movement disbanded, and some of its leaders in the Soviet Union arrested. An official Soviet publication partially confirms the exploitation of the movement and describes its end. Shortly afterward, operation Trust was terminated with the arrest of those opponents of the regime who had been unwise enough to reveal themselves as such by associating with the Trust. The NEP was officially ended by Stalin in 1929 with what was called 'a socialist offensive on all fronts.' The concessions to foreign industrialists were canceled; private enterprise in the Soviet Union was prohibited; private property was confiscated; agriculture was collectivized; repression of political opposition was intensified. The NEP might never have been.

The Results of the NEP

Agriculture, industry, and trade all improved dramatically under the NEP. Although the NEP failed to attract large credits from the West, it brought technology and efficient new equipment. Thousands of Western technicians helped to industrialize the Soviet Union, and Western firms built essential factories there. It is fair to say that the foundations of Soviet heavy and military industry were laid in the 1920s with American, British, Czechoslovak, and, after the Treaty of Rapallo (1922), German help. Germany played an especially significant role in the Soviet militarization. According to the secret clauses of the treaty, Germans helped to build modern aviation and tank factories in the USSR. Communists spoke cynically of foreign concessionaires and businessmen as 'assistants of socialism.' Longrange planning and industrialization were launched. De jure recognition of the Soviet Union by the West helped the regime to neutralize internal opposition and so to stabilize itself politically. The remnants of other political parties (Socialist Revolutionaries, Mensheviks, Zionists) were suppressed, liquidated, or exiled. The peasants were pacified. The independence of the churches was broken and new, controlled 'living churches' accepted the regime. The nationalist and separatist movements in Georgia, the Ukraine, Armenia, and the Asian republics were crushed and their nations fully incorporated into the federal union. No new organized political opposition to the regime emerged during the NEP. Regular purges of communist party membership kept ideological purity intact; a minority of members succumbed to the temptations of capitalism and were expelled. The party and security service gained experience in activist methods and in controlling contacts with the West. The security service began to exercise effective control over Soviet society.

The European bloc that it was anticipated would be formed against the Soviet Union did not materialize. De jure recognition was granted by all major countries except the USA. The Russian emigre movement was successfully penetrated, discredited, and left to disintegrate. The Treaty of Rapallo, signed with Germany in 1922 (the crowning achievement of Lenin's activist diplomacy), raised Soviet prestige, helped to increase Soviet military strength, precluded a united anticommunist front in Europe, and weakened the Weimar Republic.

Between 1921 and 1929 twelve new communist parties joined the Comintern, bringing the total to forty-six. By the use of legal tactics, communist parties increased their influence in trade unions and parliaments. Though the bid to form a united front with the Socialist Internationals failed, some socialist parties—the German, French, Spanish, and Czechoslovak—split under the influence of the communist approach; the left-wing groups joined communist parties or formed new ones. Valuable experience was gained by the Comintern in the simultaneous use of revolutionary as well as legal tactics, in its readiness to switch from the one to the other, and in its ability to coordinate with Soviet diplomacy. United front tactics were successfully used by the communists in Nationalist China. Mongolia became the first Soviet satellite.

The Lesson of the NEP

The disinformation of the NEP period had been successful. Seen through Western eyes, the threat of communism under the NEP seemed to have become diffused. Fear of Bolshevism waned. The position of anticommunists was undermined. Expectations of rapprochement were aroused. The Western public, reluctant to make sacrifices, urged their governments toward further accommodation with the Soviet regime. In reality, of course, the challenge of communism had been reinforced: Western expectations were later to be rudely shattered. But the communist strategists had learned the lesson that Western leaders could be deceived and induced to make mistakes in their assessments of, and policy toward, the Soviet Union. Disinformation had in fact created favorable conditions for the success of Soviet internal policy, activist diplomacy, and Comintern activity."

We have a right to ask, is Ron Paul KGB? Is Obama? Is Merkel?

See also my articles:

Putin's Communist Gay Bashing and Its Antifascist Roots, March 07, 2014

The Reds Want to Foment World War III as a Christian Communist Versus Christian Zionist Battle of the Fanatics, March 03, 2014

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Jeff Rense Interviewed Christopher Jon Bjerknes, 9 February 2016

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Jeff Rense was not only kind enough to interview me on his program on 9 February 2016, he has posted two videos derived from the interview!

Jeff Rense & Christopher Jon Bjerknes - Einstein Exposed...Biggest Physics Fraud Ever?

Jeff Rense & Christopher Jon Bjerknes - Einstein The Liar & The Zionist Plot

Sunday, February 14, 2016

Albert Einstein, Ilse Einstein, Georg Nicolai and Their Anti-White Orgies

Christopher Jon Bjerknes

In his 1917 book The Biology of War, Albert Einstein's friend Georg Friedrich Nicolai (Lewinstein) revealed the fact that jews equate Whites to cattle and feel justified in murdering Whites,

"Apart from this strange story of Cain, however, murder is forbidden in the Bible, and very sternly forbidden. But--it is only the murder of Jews. As is natural, considering the period from which it dates, the Bible is absolutely national, in character. Only the Jew is really considered as a human being; cattle and strangers might be slain without the slayer himself being slain. In this case there was a ransom. Accordingly, war was of course allowed also, and the Jews were no more illogical than the Moslem who kills the outlander. Of late years the Jews and the Old Testament have often been reproached for their contempt for those who were not Jews; and in practice even Christ acted in precisely the same way."[1]

Nicolai (Lewinstein) maintained that it was obvious to all that the jews are a master race, superior to Whites,

"Europe, at all events, is an absolute national medley, and any one who does not consider the Jews the flower of the human race should not make such foolish assertions as that concerning the superiority of unmixed races."[ibid p. 276]

Georg Nicolai was young Ilse Einstein's lover. Else Einstein was his patient and he bed her daughter, Ilse, despite the fact that he was much older than she was. After taking her for himself, Nicolai encouraged Ilse, aged 20, to succumb to Albert Einstein's sexual advances towards her and marry him. At the time, Ilse rejected Albert's desire to fornicate with her and refused to marry him. Albert Einstein, aged 39, had already engaged in a lengthy incestuous and adulterous relationship with Ilse Einstein's mother Else, who was Albert's cousin through both his mother and his father. Having been rejected by Ilse, Albert married Else and thereby had the full "small harem" all to himself.[2]

Einstein wrote to Max Born, in an undated letter thought to have been written sometime between 24 June 1918 and 2 August 1918,

"We are well, and the small harem eat well and are thriving."[3]

Philipp Frank wrote,

"Einstein's wife Elsa died in 1936. [***] Of Einstein's two stepdaughters, one died after leaving Germany; the other, Margot, a talented sculptress, was divorced from her husband and now lives mostly with Einstein in Princeton."[4]

Even this "small harem" might not have been enough for Albert Einstein. There are reasons to believe he had an affair with Elsa Einstein's sister, Paula, another of Albert Einstein's cousins.[5] Einstein's son, Hans Albert Einstein, believed that his father was also having an affair with his secretary Helen Dukas.[6]

Albert Einstein admitted on 23 December 1918 ,

"It is correct that I committed adultery. I have been living together with my cousin, Elsa Einstein, divorced Löwenthal, for about 4 1/2 years and have been continuing these intimate relations since then."[7]

Dismayed, Ilse Einstein wrote to Georg Nicolai about Albert Einstein's sexual advances toward her,

"I have never wished nor felt the least desire to be close to [Albert Einstein] physically. This is otherwise in his case--recently at least.--He himself even admitted to me once how difficult it is for him to keep himself in check."[8]

Georg Nicolai (Lewinstein) wanted to dissolve Europe into a pan-European Union with the First World War serving a pretext, and his statement declaring these internationalist views, which Albert Einstein endorsed, evinces that one of the reasons why the jews started the First World War was to dissolve European nations out of existence as if such were the only way to achieve peace, peace which can actually only be achieved when we stop the jews from instigating wars. The other primary reason why the jews instigated World War I was to wrest Palestine from the Ottoman Empire.

Georg Nicolai presented the proposition for what was to become the jews' European Union, and Albert Einstein signed on:

"A Manifesto to Europeans

Technical science and intercommunication are clearly tending to force us to recognize the fact that international relations exist, and consequently that a world-embracing civilization exists. Yet never has any previous war caused so complete an interruption of that coöperation which should exist between civilized nations. It may, of course, be that the reason why we are so profoundly impressed by this is only that we were already united by so many ties the severing of which is painful.

That such a state of things should exist must not astonish us. Nevertheless, those who care in the slightest degree for this universal world civilization are under a twofold obligation to strive for the maintenance of these principles. Those who might have been expected to care for such things, in particular men of science and art, have hitherto almost invariably confined their utterances to a hint that the present suspension of direct relations coincided with the cessation of any desire for their continuance.

Such feelings are not to be excused by any national passions. They are unworthy of what every one has hitherto understood by civilization, and it would be a misfortune indeed were they generally to prevail among persons of culture; and not only a misfortune for civilization, but, we are firmly convinced, a misfortune for the very purpose for which, after all, in the last resort all the present hell was let loose--the national existence of the different countries.

Technical achievement has made the world smaller, and to-day the countries of that large peninsula Europe seem brought as near to one another as the cities of each individual small Mediterranean peninsula used to be; and Europe--it might almost be said the world--is already one and indivisible, owing to its multitudinous associations.

Hence it must be the duty of educated and philanthropic Europeans to make, at any rate, an effort lest Europe, owing to her not being sufficiently strongly welded together, should suffer the same tragic fate as ancient Greece. Is Europe gradually to be exhausted by fratricidal war and perish?

The war raging at present will scarcely end in a victory for any one, but probably only in defeat. Consequently, it would seem that educated men in all countries not only should, but absolutely must, exert all their influence to prevent the conditions of peace being the source of future wars, and this no matter what the present uncertain issue of the conflict may be. Above all must they direct their efforts to seeing that advantage is taken of the fact that this war has thrown all European conditions, as it were, into a melting-pot, to mold Europe into one organic whole, for which both technical and intellectual conditions are ripe.

This is not the place to discuss how this new European order is to be brought about. We desire only to assert in principle that we are firmly convinced of the time having come for all Europe to be united together, in order to protect her soil, her inhabitants, and her civilization.

Believing as we do that the desire for such a state of things is latent in many minds, we are anxious that it should everywhere find expression and thus become a force; and with this end in view it seems to us before all else necessary that there should be a union of all in any way attached to European civilization; that is to say, who are what Goethe once almost prophetically called 'good Europeans.' We must never abandon hope that their collective pronouncement may be heard by some one even amidst the clash of arms, most especially if the 'good Europeans' of to-morrow include all those who are esteemed and considered as authorities by their fellow-men.

To begin with, however, it is needful that Europeans should unite, and if, as we hope, there are enough Europeans in Europe,--in other words, enough persons to whom Europe is no mere geographical term, but something which they have profoundly at heart,--then we mean to attempt to found such a union of Europeans. We ourselves wish only to give the first impulse to such a union; wherefore we ask you, should you be in agreement with us, and, like us, bent upon making the determination of Europe as widely known as possible, to send us your signature."[9]

Albert Einstein wrote to Paul Ehrenfest on 22 March 1919, and summarized the jews' objectives in instigating the two world wars,

"[The Allied Powers] whose victory during the war I had felt would be by far the lesser evil are now proving to be only slightly the lesser evil. [***] I get most joy from the emergence of the Jewish state in Palestine. It does seem to me that our kinfolk really are more sympathetic (at least less brutal) than these horrid Europeans. Perhaps things can only improve if only the Chinese are left, who refer to all Europeans with the collective noun 'bandits.'"[10]

Georg Nicolai believed that the Chinese and other mongoloids are superior to Europeans and will be justified in exterminating Europeans in a race war of extermination. Nicolai (Lewinstein) wrote in 1917,

"§ 34.--What a War of Extermination Means

Thus to-day the original conception of war is distorted until it has become completely reversed, simply because there is no longer anything natural about war; it is now merely a romantic reminiscence. Now, it might be, and has been said, that the benefits of war come afterward. It might be thought, however, that any one thus contemplating the remote effects of war ought seriously to reflect upon its inevitable results. That is, he ought to think out his ideas to their logical conclusions, which seems easy, but is often very difficult.

The idea of war as a factor likely to favor the selection of the fittest, and thus promote human evolution, is simple enough. War is here looked upon as representing that relentless, or rather that disinterested, justice which allows the fit to survive and destroys the unfit. Those who consider this right should act accordingly, and proceed to draw up rules accordingly. They ought to adopt the usages of war of which we read in ancient history, rules by which old men were killed and also unborn children, but not the seemingly humane (!) rules of modern times--rules which make war a farce in the sense in which a natural scientist uses the word; that is to say, cause it to promote negative selection, and thus convert it into a means of deterioration

The gulf which apparently separates the selfish human being of to-day from the humane promoter of civilization is merely apparent; and here I would recall what I have already said about struggle between animals and struggle between man and man. Both are justifiable in themselves and both can be carried on logically. Difficulties do not arise until we begin to imagine that it is allowable to carry on an animal struggle against human beings and by human methods. This is senseless, and therefore criminal; for war as waged at present can be considered only a justifiable form of struggle for existence if the nations against whom we are waging war are not looked upon as human beings, at any rate not as human beings on a level with ourselves; that is, if it is desired to carry on a war of extermination against barbarians so as to enable true humanity to find room upon and spread over the earth. No European will feel that he is justified in considering another European as a barbarian. The utmost which might be asked is whether we are not entitled to consider ourselves a superior race in comparison with certain undeveloped races, such as the Andamans or Tierra del Fuegans. What will undoubtedly occur is that these people will gradually be exterminated by the white race, though it has long been clear that it would be extremely foolish to make war upon them. They die out of themselves wherever they come in contact with whites, bloodless warfare being always more effectual than bloody.

There is only one race for which this question of racial superiority might be profoundly important--the Mongolian. I do not know who are the superior, the Mongolians or we ourselves, but I can quite understand our looking on the Mongolian race as enemies, and that, for instance, Europeans on the highest plane would not easily be induced to have a child by a Mongolian woman, at any rate not to own it. I can therefore also fully understand that we or the Mongolians might say, 'Only one of us two races can rule over the world, and we want that race to be ours.'

In this case the biologically weaker race--that is, the one which may rest assured that in ordinary course it would fall a victim to natural selection--might perhaps be justified in saying, 'As there is no chance of our getting the upper hand by natural and lawful means, we will try to take by force what nature withholds from us.' This shows very plainly that for the really strong war is superfluous; and as obviously it is generally folly for the weak, it is self-evident that, save in the rarest instances, there can be no possible object whatever in it.

Now, it is possible that one such rare instance may be afforded by the Mongolians, for, unlike all the other colored races, they seem to be in certain respects fitter than Europeans, although it is impossible to know exactly how they will be affected when once they are drawn into the vortex of modern civilization. Meantime, however, the sons of Heaven have the enormous advantage of being able to work equally well under all heavens, whether in the icy wastes of the tundras or under the burning sun of Sumatra. Apparently this is a special Mongolian peculiarity, for even primitive Teutonic peoples simply melted away under the Southern sun to which their impulse led them, and negro races get consumption if transferred to colder climates.

If all this is really the case, then the greater part of the habitable world belongs to the Mongols, and likewise the overlordship thereof; for it seems out of the question, seeing how much going to and fro there already is and how much more there is certain to be in the near future, that two races should live side by side and yet apart. They will mix, and one will prevail over the other.

But perhaps even the most humane of us all would not desire this, and therefore I can imagine our pointing with pardonable pride to our civilization, and saying that we are ready to take up arms in defense of it. You Mongols may be better than we are, we would say, but you are different. We do not want to know anything about your civilization, even supposing it to be superior; we mean to keep our own. From this point of view I can imagine a war, but then it must be really a relentless, merciless war

There are now in the world five hundred millions of us Europeans or white men originally from Europe, and a thousand millions of various colored races. I believe we have even now the technical means at our disposal for exterminating these thousand millions in the course of the next twenty years. After twenty years, however, we shall no longer be in a position to do this, as soon, that is, as China has armed her whole population, constructs her own dreadnoughts, and manufactures her own cannon and shells, as Japan is already doing.

In the ensuing twenty years, therefore, it is possible that the fate of the world will be decided once and for all, and the responsibility for this decision rests with the five hundred millions of Europeans. The Mongolians need do nothing but wait, for time and space are on their side.

At a time when the fate of so many men is hanging in the balance, Europeans may, perhaps must, be asked whether on careful consideration they mean to declare all colored races barbarians, and then begin a struggle for existence, in other, words a war of extermination, and not a ridiculous war for power, against everything non-European. When once so terrible a conception as that of such a war is grasped, then, if anything save senseless cruelty is to be the result, it also must be thought out to the end, and there would have to be a war sans trève et sans relâche

We must not spare even the child in its mother's womb, and must tolerate no bastards. Such a war would be ghastly, but there would be some object in it. It is useless to talk of the justice of a war, but in a sense this ghastliest of wars is the justest because, at any rate, 'it serves its own particular purpose.'

To me it seems at least conceivable that some such war might succeed, although I certainly do not believe this. History, indeed, proves over and over that the despair of nations fighting for their lives gives rise to strength which enables them to triumph over all technical expedients. Here, again, any attempt to interfere with the justice of history by such brutal methods might only too easily hasten the downfall of Europe. European nations, as I think, would do better to concentrate all their economic, technical, and scientific resources on increasing their internal vital energy, that is, on promoting race hygiene in every respect, and thus endeavor to become the equals and even the superiors of the Mongols

This opens up vistas of victories not purchased with blood--victories which I am profoundly convinced are within the bounds of possibility. This inextinguishable hope is due to my proud European racial instinct. I will not, and I refuse to, admit that the Mongols have in the long run greater vitality than I. I trust that the majority of Europeans think as I do, and that never shall we show the Asiatics such a sign of weakness as to draw the sword against them. Even if the European nations were faint-hearted, even if they were doubtful of ultimate peaceful victory, and if nothing seemed to stand in the way of their extermination by force, even, then I would shrink from resort to force, and I am convinced that the majority of mankind agree with me.

Every one, however, must compound with his own conscience, and should any one be anxious to proceed to victory by way of force, I will go a step further to please him. I feel that all Europeans belong to the same race, and I am proud of this. But others certainly feel this less keenly than I do, and they let their wholesome race instinct run to waste in all manner of fantastic and useless notions, such as the supposed existence of a Teutonic race.[Footnote: Cf. §§ 90-105, about race patriotism.

But there are those who believe in the Teutons, Germans, or Prussians having a right to predominate. I shall not here discuss the justification for such ideas, but those who would fain lead such small aggregates of human beings to victory must at any rate ask themselves whether they are able and, if able, also willing, to fight out this fight in the only way in which it can answer its purpose

As for Teutonism, the question is as follows: take the one hundred million Germans or, properly speaking, the twenty millions more or less pure Teutons living in various parts of Europe, most of whom will have nothing whatever to do with the conception of Teutonism. Do they believe that they can with any prospect of success embark upon a struggle against forces from fifteen to a hundred times more numerous, and do they really mean to destroy these? If they have made up their minds to this, then let them make the attempt, and they will be fighting for an idea, and for an object which is at least conceivable

We are therefore faced with the following alternative: we must either resolve to live in peace with the French, Russians, English, and whatever all their names may be, or we must wage a war of extermination upon them, a war whose purpose it is not to leave one of them alive

Whoever, therefore, decides for war is, at any rate, no fool, and has logic on his side. Nevertheless, I hope and believe that even those who most delight in war will incline toward peace when once they realize what is the inevitable alternative. But this senseless playing at war which is now devastating Europe must be the last of its kind."[11]

Soon after Georg Friedrich Nicolai issued his call for a European Union, and stated that the mongols will be justified in exterminating the White Race, Freemason Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi made his pitch, sponsored by the jewish bankers Rothschild and Warburg, for the European Union in the hopes of breeding out the White Race through miscegenation with Africans, Middle Easterners and Asians. Coudenhove-Kalergi maintained that the jews were the master race and it was necessary to destroy the White Race to make room for jewish World rule, as I explained in my recent article, The Jewish Genocide of Europe: Kaganovich, Yagoda, Ehrenburg and Coudenhove-Kalergi

I go into Albert Einstein's genocidal anti-European racism in far greater depth in my books Mileva Einstein-Marity Einstein's Partner in Crime and ALBERT EINSTEIN The Incorrigible RACIST.

--------------------

1). G. Nicolai, Die Biologie des Krieges, Betrachtungen eines deutschen Naturforschers, O. Füssli, Zürich, (1917); English translation: The Biology of War, Century Co., New York, (1918), p. 531.

2). A. Einstein to Ilse Einstein, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 536, Princeton University Press, (1998); and Ilse Einstein to Georg Nikolai, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 545, Princeton University Press, (1998). A. Calaprice, D. Kennefick, R. Schulmann, "Georg Nicolai", An Einstein Encyclopedia, Princeton University Press, (2015), pp.73-74. D. Overbye, "Einstein, Confused in Love and, Sometimes, Physics", The New York Times, (31 August 1999). D. Overbye, Einstein in Love: A Scientific Romance, Viking, New York, (2000), pp. 343, 404, note 22.

3). A. Einstein, English translation by I. Born in M. Born, The Born-Einstein Letters, Walker and Company, New York, (1971), p. 8.

4). P. Frank, Einstein: His Life and Times, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, (1947), p. 293.

5). R. Highfield and P. Carter, The Private Lives of Albert Einstein, St. Martin's Press, New York, (1993), p. 148.

6). P. A. Bucky, Einstein, and A. G. Weakland, "Einstein's Roving Eye", The Private Albert Einstein, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City, (1992), pp. 127-135.

7). "Deposition in Divorce Proceedings" English translation by A. M. Hentschel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 676, Princeton University Press, (1998), p. 713. See also: M. Zackheim, Einstein's Daughter, the Search for Lieserl, Riverhead Books, Penguin Putnam, New York, (1999), pp. 78-79.

8). Ilse Einstein to Georg Nikolai, English translation by A. M. Hentschel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 545, Princeton University Press, (1998), p. 565. See also: D. Overbye, Einstein in Love: A Scientific Romance, Viking, New York, (2000), pp. 343, 404, note 22. See also: A. Einstein to Ilse Einstein, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8, Document 536, Princeton University Press, (1998).

9).G. Nicolai, Die Biologie des Krieges, Betrachtungen eines deutschen Naturforschers, O. Füssli, Zürich, (1917); English translation: The Biology of War, Century Co., New York, (1918), pp. xvii-xix.

10). Letter from A. Einstein to P. Ehrenfest of 22 March 1919, English translation by A. Hentschel, The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 9, Document 10, Princeton Univsersity Press, (2004), pp. 9-10, at 10.

11). G. Nicolai, Die Biologie des Krieges, Betrachtungen eines deutschen Naturforschers, O. Füssli, Zürich, (1917); English translation: The Biology of War, Century Co., New York, (1918), pp. 84-89.